Duzo wskazuje na to iż Cheney mówi prawdę, jednak nie da się ukryć dużej rozbierznosc w jego opowieściach , co podwarza jego wiarygodność . Moja uwagę w wywiadzie zwrócił tez fragment.”D: And that was at the time when the Los Angeles Times, I guess it was, had a lot of Zodiac articles, and that was when it, uh, when I learned that there was a case with notoriety. Somebody had breakfast in the Fluor cafeteria, somebody said, “Doesn’t that guy look like your friend?” And there was a, the artist sketch was in the paper and, yeah, sure did. The only guy at Fluor that could have said that was my brother-in-law, his name was Don Ebersole. There wasn’t anybody else at Fluor that could have met Leigh in my presence. That, it had to be him.
T: Which sketch did he see that, uh . . .
D: It was the one that looked like Leigh, of the, uh . . .
T: There was one with glasses and without glasses.
D: No glasses. This was, uh, this was the, uh, what was that, uh, Blue Rock Road, or whatever’s the name, Blue Lake?
T: Well, there, oh the lake?
D: This was the survivor from one of those first two Vallejo cases. Before the Berryessa.
Tak sobie myśle być może był to profil Zodiaka wedlog M. Mageau który widział głównie profil Zodiaka.
D: This one, I don’t think it had glasses. It was a profile. And it was a picture of Leigh.”
„ There was one, uh, connected with some killings up around Sacramento or Grass Valley, or somewhere up in that direction, and it was a similar face to Leigh’s, but it had big jowls, and it was altered in some way. But it was suspected that it might be Zodiac-related. I don’t know if it was ever proved to be. „. Czy to może być kolejne „działanie „Zodiaka ?
